<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ride Aboard the Link Train</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blue-anvil.com/archives/ride-aboard-the-link-train/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blue-anvil.com/archives/ride-aboard-the-link-train/</link>
	<description>The online blogfolio of Mike Jolley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:59:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Jolley</title>
		<link>http://blue-anvil.com/archives/ride-aboard-the-link-train/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jolley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://82.110.105.91/blue-anvil.co.uk/?p=64#comment-628</guid>
		<description>Well...wasn&#039;t my idea.. :S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;wasn&#8217;t my idea.. :S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob cooper</title>
		<link>http://blue-anvil.com/archives/ride-aboard-the-link-train/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>rob cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://82.110.105.91/blue-anvil.co.uk/?p=64#comment-629</guid>
		<description>Would we not remove the top 3 in the original list when we add our fave&#039;s to the bottom.  Otherwise this list would get WAY out of control.  This is how the old &quot;christmas cheer&quot; schemes would work.  It seems to make more sense to me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would we not remove the top 3 in the original list when we add our fave&#8217;s to the bottom.  Otherwise this list would get WAY out of control.  This is how the old &#8220;christmas cheer&#8221; schemes would work.  It seems to make more sense to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navdeep</title>
		<link>http://blue-anvil.com/archives/ride-aboard-the-link-train/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Navdeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://82.110.105.91/blue-anvil.co.uk/?p=64#comment-627</guid>
		<description>Great... you kept the train going</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great&#8230; you kept the train going</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arpit Jacob</title>
		<link>http://blue-anvil.com/archives/ride-aboard-the-link-train/comment-page-1/#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>Arpit Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://82.110.105.91/blue-anvil.co.uk/?p=64#comment-626</guid>
		<description>OK I don&#039;t like this Idea that much I hate chain mails. But I am going to Fav you :) and hopefully you fav me back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK I don&#8217;t like this Idea that much I hate chain mails. But I am going to Fav you <img src='http://blue-anvil.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  and hopefully you fav me back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

