<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE8 has change of heart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blue-anvil.com/archives/ie8-has-change-of-heart/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blue-anvil.com/archives/ie8-has-change-of-heart</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://blue-anvil.com/archives/ie8-has-change-of-heart#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 02:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blue-anvil.com/archives/ie8-has-change-of-heart#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>Well, if MS had stuck to the standards from the beginning, they wouldn't be in this mess, nor would millions of web designers, annoyed by the typical M lack of 'sticking to standards'.

Just my $0.02</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if MS had stuck to the standards from the beginning, they wouldn&#8217;t be in this mess, nor would millions of web designers, annoyed by the typical M lack of &#8217;sticking to standards&#8217;.</p>
<p>Just my $0.02</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milorad</title>
		<link>http://blue-anvil.com/archives/ie8-has-change-of-heart#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator>Milorad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blue-anvil.com/archives/ie8-has-change-of-heart#comment-1874</guid>
		<description>it's easy to knock microsoft over this issue, but do try to keep in mind that there are many many millions of pages coded specifically to handle IE's quirks.

just suddenly supporting standards without backwards compatibility for the broken-standards would be irresponsible to web developers who have worked so hard, and cried so much about IE's bugs for so many years.

This is going to magically fix the pages of people who don't give a crap about IE, but it will cause more work for people who have worked hard to code around IE's issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s easy to knock microsoft over this issue, but do try to keep in mind that there are many many millions of pages coded specifically to handle IE&#8217;s quirks.</p>
<p>just suddenly supporting standards without backwards compatibility for the broken-standards would be irresponsible to web developers who have worked so hard, and cried so much about IE&#8217;s bugs for so many years.</p>
<p>This is going to magically fix the pages of people who don&#8217;t give a crap about IE, but it will cause more work for people who have worked hard to code around IE&#8217;s issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAB_au</title>
		<link>http://blue-anvil.com/archives/ie8-has-change-of-heart#comment-1806</link>
		<dc:creator>JAB_au</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blue-anvil.com/archives/ie8-has-change-of-heart#comment-1806</guid>
		<description>Must say this is a good move by Microsoft, however you would think that instead of making new tags for us to use they could actually focus on making it follow standard properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must say this is a good move by Microsoft, however you would think that instead of making new tags for us to use they could actually focus on making it follow standard properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
